For Productive Web Browsing, Gearfire Recommends Nov 07
13
4 ways to use Wikipedia (hint: never cite it)
You should NEVER cite Wikipedia in an academic paper. Your teacher will think you are at best lazy and at worst an idiot if you do. But that doesn’t mean that Wikipedia is useless; far from it. Here are 4 ways to use Wikipedia to write better papers without needing to cite it at all.
- Background information: The Grapes of Wrath makes a lot more sense if you understand the dust bowl of the depression. The fighting in Iraq makes more sense if you understand that it wasn’t until after World War I that it became one country under the British. Knowing the context of your topic can help you understand that material better and write about it more clearly.
- Links: At the bottom of every article is a list of external links. These sites are often articles or respected authorities that you CAN cite. For example you could use a few liens from the Woody Guthrie song Tom Joad about his experience of seeing the film Grapes of Wrath in a paper on the topic. There are also good links in the Notes section (which are the references for factual statements made in the article).
- Keywords: Sometimes coming up with the right keywords for a library or google search is the hardest part of a research project. The Wikipedia page can give you a ton of clues about what word combinations will get you the best results. For example “drought” gets a lot more irrelevant hits than “dust bowl”.
- References: Also at the bottom of each article is a list of books and articles that were used to put this article together. Those are things you can read and later cite. A librarian can help you get a copy if you can’t find them yourself.
The goal here is not to take Wikipedia as gospel but to use it to focus your research (via links, keywords and references) and get a little context (via background information). Focusing cuts down the time you spend on the project while context will get you a better grade for your effort.
Sydney said
am November 13 2007 @ 11:50 am
Great post…my Comp teacher actually just lectured my class over this last week. I can’t believe how many people actually cite Wikipedia.
David Gerard said
am November 13 2007 @ 4:39 pm
Speaking from the trenches of Wikipedia … spot on! It’s an encyclopedia, use it as a backgrounder for yourself only and double-check any substantive fact you assert. It’s a starting point, not a finishing point. (And the whole thing is a live working draft, so though it gets better on average with time any given page at the wrong moment may be HORRIBLY wrong. Keep your wits about you.)
Phill Bailey said
am November 13 2007 @ 7:27 pm
I’m a first year undergrad, and every time essays are mentioned, we’re told don’t use wikipedia! The darned thing is, that for simple background on something or someone for a bit of information you’re giving in passing, there’s nothing quite so easy as to whack it into wikipedia. I certainly wouldn’t want to search JSTOR every time I had to find basic stuff out, I’d actually top myself! I will admit that on my first essay I did cite wikipedia, slaps wrist, boohissboo. I dread to imagine what comment I’ll get for that - however I am only hoping for a third on it…
Lifehack Digest for November 13th - lifehack.org said
am November 14 2007 @ 9:30 am
[…] 4 ways to use Wikipedia (hint: never cite it)Wikipedia is a great resource for academic work, though not as a source in a paper. GearFire Student Productivity spells out what you CAN use it for: background information, links to solid sources, and ideas about serching for more information.Tags: wikipedia student research writing papers […]
4 Ways to Use Wikipedia « CHIC LRC: Library & Tutoring Center said
am November 14 2007 @ 4:35 pm
[…] help you. Click here to find out how. Posted in Best of the Web, Homework […]
rebecca said
am November 14 2007 @ 11:58 pm
Finally: Good Advice on Wikipedia « Megan Golding said
am November 15 2007 @ 10:08 pm
[…] Finally: Good Advice on Wikipedia Posted on November 15, 2007 by Megan Golding Don’t remember where I first heard of the Gearfire Student Productivity blog I’m thrilled for the referral. One post this week really impressed me: “4 ways to use Wikipedia (hint: never cite it)“. […]
Albert | UrbanMonk.Net said
am November 29 2007 @ 10:58 pm
Hmm…wikipedia is very very hit and miss. For academic stuff, I would say it’s pretty reliable. But I’m a boxing / MMA fan, and some of the articles in there must have been written by the fighters themselves. I remember one guy who was the punching bag for everyone else, but the wikipedia article stated he was three time world champion. Freaking hilarious!
Cheers,
Albert | UrbanMonk.Net
Modern personal development, entwined with ancient spirituality.
academhack » Blog Archive » More Wikipedia Non-Sense said
am December 6 2007 @ 1:20 pm
[…] for students who are in college check out Gearfire’s run down of how to use Wikipedia. (Note to ill-informed: Gearfire gets it right. Wikipedia is an […]
Study Hacks » Blog Archive » 25 Articles Every Student Should Read said
am December 6 2007 @ 5:19 pm
[…] Four Ways to Use Wikipedia (hint: never cite it) | GearFire […]
Jake’s Life » More Resources I Wish I Had In College said
am December 8 2007 @ 3:52 am
[…] 4 Ways to use Wikipedia (without citing it) at Gearfire […]
pjg084 said
am December 9 2007 @ 8:48 pm
This is a great article. I am glad somebody wrote something along these lines as it’s what I have been thinking for a long time. I have wondered how many people have actually thought to look into the references etc at the base of the page.
4 Tips on how to make better use of Wikipedia « 1855 said
am January 12 2008 @ 9:41 am
[…] use of Wikipedia January 12, 2008 GearFire, an weblog for “academic success” has a useful post on how to unleash the power of the Wikipedia without citing it in your paper: Nothing that I […]
WikiSummary | GearFire - Tips for Students said
am February 10 2008 @ 11:44 am
[…] or complete. If you haven’t already read it, be sure to check out Rebecca’s related post on how to use Wikipedia. digg_url = “http://www.gearfire.net/wikisummary/”;digg_title = […]
Pete White said
am February 29 2008 @ 12:10 pm
99% of the time there is nothing wrong with Wikipedia as a source. It has great material and the facts are as good as many other sources. The problem is that because a resource like Wikipedia was not available in the teachers day anyone who uses it instantly gets branded lazy even if what they have written about is perfectly good.
Wikipedia shouldn’t be used as an only source but to tell people they shouldn’t be citing it at all is ridicilous.
beauty blog said
am April 9 2008 @ 4:19 pm
actually my sister was JUST telling me how her professor does not allow Wikipedia as a valid source for papers and essays. It’s too bad, I think Wikipedia is one of the most powerful collaborative resources out there. It’s not an encyclopedia from 70 authors… it’s a huge online knowledge base of 2.4 million contributors!
busby seo challenge said
am June 10 2008 @ 8:49 am
Wikipedia content is not reliable i guess its not checked and compiled by teacher and scholar,One option which is hated by me the most is editing, Editing my any one.
PPC said
am June 12 2008 @ 3:38 am
Citing Wikipedia is suicide if you’re doing projects. Rather follow the contributors and cite them as references in your work.
Lillie said
am June 24 2008 @ 2:13 pm
Great, simple information. Do you mind if I use this for student handouts as a resource? I’ll be sure to cite your work!
Poems Girl said
am August 1 2008 @ 3:53 pm
oh, thank you for hints
Dewaji SEO Test said
am January 10 2009 @ 12:08 am
Smart idea on “cheating” wikipedia. I think it’s great to find more cite by using wikipedia. I never realize about this. Thanks mate
Current account said
am January 23 2009 @ 8:35 am
Wikipedia like will all know is edited by anyone, so in terms of accurancy of content??? But that being said, I used it when writing my dissertation but only for definitions.
Class said
am January 27 2009 @ 7:17 pm
Good stuff, hits on a lot of important things we often overlook or push off till later, but we could benefit from by doing now.
Linda said
am March 1 2009 @ 6:14 pm
Great for research. What would we do without it?
LCD said
am April 6 2009 @ 2:29 pm
Working from no. 4 the references is the best way to use Wikipedia. Usually there is a fairly good list to work with.
DoFollow Backlinks said
am May 4 2009 @ 11:43 pm
This goes the same for the workplace. A coworker got called out on this last week and the director just laughed at him.
Current account said
am May 5 2009 @ 7:57 am
Great, simple information. Do you mind if I use this for student handouts as a resource? I’ll be sure to cite your work!
Thanks
Max Netten said
am May 11 2009 @ 11:39 am
It is great that teachers do not want one of the most authoritative works in human history to be cited. Classic teacher think– or not think.
Max
Prepaid Cell phone Guy said
am May 11 2009 @ 11:43 am
Has anyone ever checked the accuracy of the textbooks that we use to educate our kids? Wikipedia while far from perfect at least has multiple people adding content instead of a few writer building a text book.
Also Wiki usually has differing opinions in the same article.
Guy
Twin XL said
am May 17 2009 @ 10:42 pm
Never never never never never EVER cite Wiki… eeek, it’ll drop your grade for sure. But I like the first suggestion about background research. Thanks!
Austin said
am May 21 2009 @ 5:15 pm
Most, if not all, of my professors in college were perfectly okay with their students citing Wikipedia. In fact, I had one professor who strongly encouraged it. He was a linguistics professor and, as he stated, Wikipedia has some very thorough descriptions of many languages’ phonologies, including very uncommon languages. Yet as this professor pointed out, he advised us to use Wikipedia just like any other source in that one would not cite only one source in an academic paper. He or she would always look to a multitude of sources, therein providing some checks and balances to his or her own work. If one is doing just that, what is wrong with having Wikipedia be one of those sources?
web marketing man said
am May 28 2009 @ 5:54 am
My friend who is studying at the University of the Witwatersrand actually highlighted this very issue to methe other day, as the professors don’t like Wikipedia, period. The links at the bottom of the Wikipedia page, along with a bit of independent research is what he focuses on using as his research sources.
Keyword Service said
am July 8 2009 @ 5:22 am
yeah, lol wikipedia is a teachers worst enemy. Of course, students use it all of the time. It can be very useful, I think that even teachers can admit to that. I typically look to wikipedia in the very beginning stages of a paper/ project. It definitely helps me to see what I should look for, where I should start etc.
-Kevin
Steven Lance said
am July 13 2009 @ 9:35 am
I am always going to wikipedia in all of my research. there is so much information there.
arabam said
am July 20 2009 @ 4:56 pm
This is a great article. I am glad somebody wrote something along these lines as it’s what I have been thinking for a long time. I have wondered how many people have actually thought to look into the references etc at the base of the page.
Link Degisimi said
am July 21 2009 @ 7:09 am
Hi Phill - Rather than citing Wikipedia directly you can look to the links at the bottom or the reference section to find more reputable and stable sites. It’s a LOT easier to document background information once you know what you are looking for.
Tylor said
am July 30 2009 @ 11:10 pm
search the google then find your site.that is a really nice post.thx man
Tylor said
am July 30 2009 @ 11:11 pm
search the google then find your site.
that is a really nice post.
thx man
Cheap Pennsylvania Insurance said
am August 20 2009 @ 12:38 pm
Link Degisimi - you are absolutely right! I always use those link to find out more about topic! Those links are really helpful!
bingo said
am September 1 2009 @ 7:34 am
Hello everybody. Great opinions here.
Cute Graphics said
am September 20 2009 @ 10:43 pm
These are some great hints and information in regard to using Wikipedia. Thanks a million.
Mike Dickison said
am October 28 2009 @ 3:44 pm
Speaking as a university teacher, Wikipedia is great and usually very accurate; as accurate as any other encyclopedia. I use it every day. However it’s not a primary source, and thus, like a dictionary or printed encyclopedia or magazine article, is usually not acceptable for citing in a university essay. That’s always been the way; it’s not unique to Wikipedia. Students should be trying to cite original, peer-reviewed academic articles in journals wherever possible (like the ones Wikipedia itself cites).
Coafuri mirese said
am November 2 2009 @ 5:30 pm
Awesome post. love that you can actually read comics on wikipedia – one of the wonders of the internet, i guess.
Jayvie said
am November 6 2009 @ 8:23 am
i am using wikipedia to research different topic like movies, science and other, because there are many information there.
Breast lift Philadelphia said
am November 12 2009 @ 1:56 pm
Great post! Wikipedia has been a very important site for those who want immediate information about something. In fact, it is a good learning site for everyone as it serves as the most accessible online library.
mimar said
am December 24 2009 @ 7:09 am
Wikipedia content is not reliable i guess its not checked and compiled by teacher and scholar,One option which is hated by me the most is editing, Editing my any one.
scalp med said
am January 1 2010 @ 9:31 pm
Never thought of using wikipedia in these ways. I’ll be using these tips for sure.
Scaffold boards said
am January 10 2010 @ 6:21 pm
Awesome post. I love that actually i can read comics on wikipedia – one of the wonders of the internet, i guess.
Dan Northern said
am January 15 2010 @ 6:49 pm
Nice Post. I love Wikipedia, I haven’t used it much for school, yet, but I love browsing it and finding new and interesting information
radyo dinle said
am January 17 2010 @ 10:47 am
Agree that this is a good tactic. I have a feed reader that harvests for my key words, and I look for trends and news, then use it to spawn ideas for what I will write about.
Megan Fox said
am January 26 2010 @ 9:48 pm
I think wikipedia is a great site, I don’t understand why these educators look down on it. Thanks for these tips also.
xhamster said
am January 30 2010 @ 7:49 am
Awesome post. love that you can actually read comics on wikipedia – one of the wonders of the internet, i guess.
Digital SLR Camera said
am February 18 2010 @ 5:25 am
thats true,
Wikipedia’s intent is to have articles that cover existing knowledge, not create new knowledge (original research.
but the teacher needs something innovatve ways to teach